![]() Part of it seems to be the Ducati appeal - online editors don't seem as serious, they seem like a form of training wheels, but that's a stigma that's rapidly changing. ![]() Which brings us full circle - do you really need Photoshop? Is the future of image editing in full-featured suites like Photoshop? Or is the future of image editing for the average person much more likely to take the form of online applications? For most Flickr users and other casual photographers online tools like Picnik or Adobe's own coming Photoshop Express seem capable of handling all their editing needs, so why then do we cling to Photoshop (or GIMP)? While this has been around for many years, Adobe has put a lot of. No one wants a Ducati with training wheels.” I know lots of photographers who use the Liquify tool in Photoshop for things like. But Nack isn't about to take away advanced features, as he points out, “no one wants to be the guy who drops three grand on an SLR, then leaves it in moron mode.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |